Midkarth County (Sky_xRe_09) [berry]

View and discuss completed claims
Post Reply
User avatar
worsas
Project Administrator
Posts: 2090
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:23 am

Midkarth County (Sky_xRe_09) [berry]

Post by worsas » Sat May 07, 2016 7:31 pm

A claim for updating the area labelled 9 on this map:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/stmw0yp43laui ... claims.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This claim is dependant on the outcome of the Markarth claim.

Related discussion:
viewtopic.php?f=87&t=567" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Location map thread:
viewtopic.php?f=145&t=499" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Scamp
Lesser Daedra
Posts: 426
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 2:51 pm
Location: Kilkreath Mountains
Contact:

Post by Scamp » Sat Sep 30, 2017 2:35 pm

============= CLAIM UPDATE =============

The original map is now outdated with regard to this claim. An updated outline of this claim area can be found on the map below.

Image

User avatar
berry
PT Modder
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2015 4:16 pm

Post by berry » Wed Dec 06, 2017 7:33 pm

If that's okay with everybody, I'd like to complete this claim alongisde the MK claim, merging them both for the time being.

My reasoning is there's isn't really enough work to do here for it to be a full-blown claim, plus it would be more reasonable to work on this with a bigger picture of Karth basin in mind.

Additionaly, let's not forget how sexy it would be to have all the exterior area from Dragonfields to Falkheim finished already. :P

User avatar
worsas
Project Administrator
Posts: 2090
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:23 am

Post by worsas » Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:38 pm

If you haven't included this claim yet, you can take the cells from the below file.
Attachments
Sky_xRe09.esp
(1.64 MiB) Downloaded 22 times

User avatar
Scamp
Lesser Daedra
Posts: 426
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 2:51 pm
Location: Kilkreath Mountains
Contact:

Post by Scamp » Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:56 pm

Sure thing, I'll just move it to claimed but you don't have to upload a file here. Just post it together with the rest in the Markarth thread.

User avatar
worsas
Project Administrator
Posts: 2090
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:23 am

Post by worsas » Sat Dec 09, 2017 11:49 am

Hey berry, after claiming that last bit of druadach highlands and skimming through our old notes, I remember again that we had the great intent of primarily distinguishing the grassy druadach highlands from the midkarth county by making the former a distinctive bushland, while the latter should remain much less bushy and more grassland-like.

Make sure not to place too many aggressive rocks and bushes.. And I'll make sure to do the reverse.

User avatar
berry
PT Modder
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2015 4:16 pm

Post by berry » Mon Dec 11, 2017 2:22 pm

No worries, I've been trying not to exaggerate here, keeping the changes rather minimal, following the Midkarth conceptualization thread's guidelines. The biggest change I did was replacing the Breton tower in -104,16 with a Nord one, as to my understanding it was too deep within the 'core' Skyrim. I kept the one in -110,18 though.

I plan to post the finished file in the evening or tomorrow, tops.
worsas wrote:If you haven't included this claim yet, you can take the cells from the below file.
Thanks, I had cut them from the rest exteriors file already. Are those any different? I can redo these cells again with that file as a basis.

User avatar
worsas
Project Administrator
Posts: 2090
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:23 am

Post by worsas » Mon Dec 11, 2017 6:28 pm

Thanks, I had cut them from the rest exteriors file already. Are those any different?
Nope, those are just the plain cells cut from the RestExteriors file. I had them, because I was considering taking this claim some time ago. Now I'm working on 08 instead. :D

User avatar
berry
PT Modder
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2015 4:16 pm

Post by berry » Tue Dec 12, 2017 8:15 pm

Ok, that's a relief. :P The file could still come in handy in removing these cells from the rest exteriors file, right? I think naming the cells of claim #9 distinctively (eg. "DELETEME"), loading this file together with the rest exteriors one, with this one as the active, merging the two files, removing all the DELETEME cells in TESAME and then resaving the rest exteriors file in CS for the landscape refs to disappear as well should do the job easily and sterilely? If so, I can take care of it.

User avatar
worsas
Project Administrator
Posts: 2090
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:23 am

Post by worsas » Tue Dec 12, 2017 9:11 pm

that would be one possibility. Alternatively, I can handle the cell removal with the help of the quick editor, too. However you like.

User avatar
berry
PT Modder
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2015 4:16 pm

Post by berry » Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:05 pm

Well, I supposed there was a more simple way, but none I could come up with :P Anyway aforementioned method seems to work, I posted the file on the internal boards.

User avatar
Scamp
Lesser Daedra
Posts: 426
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 2:51 pm
Location: Kilkreath Mountains
Contact:

Post by Scamp » Sat Mar 31, 2018 11:01 pm

Approved.

Post Reply

Return to “Completed”