Search found 311 matches

by Scamp
Sun Jan 21, 2018 1:05 pm
Forum: SHotN General Discussion
Topic: Managing exterior progress
Replies: 2
Views: 32

Re: Managing exterior progress

I'd say that we should generally make one "section" file (if you want to call it that way) alongside Sky_main and Rest_exteriors that contains recent exterior _and_ interior claims belonging to the next planned release. Once the release is ready, this section file would be merged with Sky_Main and u...
by Scamp
Sat Dec 30, 2017 3:17 pm
Forum: Claimed
Topic: Falkheim (Sky_xRe_02) [spineinside]
Replies: 12
Views: 1935

Re: Falkheim (Sky_xRe_02) [spineinside]

Alright here's a base file for you, should have all cells + northern border, minus the eastern row that borders my claim #3.

Border will follow shortly. Sorry for the delay.

Overview image from discord:

Image
by Scamp
Sat Dec 30, 2017 2:16 am
Forum: Reviewing
Topic: The Reach: House (Sky_iRe_DH15) [Outlander]
Replies: 4
Views: 951

Re: The Reach: House (Sky_iRe_DH15) [Outlander]

Off to review then!
by Scamp
Sun Dec 17, 2017 2:43 am
Forum: Claimed
Topic: Snowhawk Mountain|Falkirstad (Sky_xRe_03) [Scamp]
Replies: 4
Views: 963

Re: Snowhawk Mountain|Falkirstad (Sky_xRe_03) [Scamp]

First upload. Mnt Snowhawk rework progress...

Very WIP... layout is finished, but lots of detailing work to do. Floaters, old shading, casperers, texture seams, this file has it all.

Not compatible with Markarth file !
by Scamp
Sat Dec 16, 2017 1:49 am
Forum: SHotN Concept Art
Topic: Landscaping ideas
Replies: 22
Views: 5507

Re: Landscaping ideas

Kilkreath mountains as seen from Haafinheim: http://wpnature.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/mountain-awesome-landscape-canada-forest-river-clouds-sunshie-mount-chephren-top-wallpapers.jpg https://www.walldevil.com/wallpapers/a78/wallpapers-winter-temple-canada-snow-mount-forest-river-mountain-trees....
by Scamp
Tue Dec 12, 2017 8:57 pm
Forum: Reviewing
Topic: Markarth (Sky_xRe_Mk) [berry]
Replies: 170
Views: 27202

Re: Markarth (Sky_xRe_Mk) [berry]

Nice, will take a look later this week. Does "as good as finished" mean it's ready for review though?
by Scamp
Tue Dec 12, 2017 5:07 pm
Forum: Claimed
Topic: Falkheim (Sky_xRe_02) [spineinside]
Replies: 12
Views: 1935

Re: Falkheim (Sky_xRe_02) [spineinside]

Hi spineinside, I would like to handle claim borders a little differently to how TR does them. My proposal is that either you detail a little beyond your border to #3, that is, one third of each cell of the westernmost column of claim #3, or I detail a little bit beyond the #3 border, which would be...
by Scamp
Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:56 pm
Forum: Reviewing
Topic: Midkarth County (Sky_xRe_09) [berry]
Replies: 10
Views: 1115

Re: Midkarth County (Sky_xRe_09) [Unclaimed]

Sure thing, I'll just move it to claimed but you don't have to upload a file here. Just post it together with the rest in the Markarth thread.
by Scamp
Tue Nov 28, 2017 6:54 pm
Forum: Claimed
Topic: Falkheim (Sky_xRe_01) [roerich]
Replies: 7
Views: 1043

Re: Falkheim (Sky_xRe_01) [Unclaimed]

Macgranteth!

Edit: Wasn't supposed to go in News, someone shift it to Exteriors->Claimed pls :D
by Scamp
Tue Nov 28, 2017 6:02 pm
Forum: Claimed
Topic: Falkheim (Sky_xRe_01) [roerich]
Replies: 7
Views: 1043

Re: Falkheim (Sky_xRe_01) [Unclaimed]

This file should be used as a base for this claim. It contains the border to claims 5+6.
by Scamp
Tue Nov 28, 2017 6:02 pm
Forum: Claimed
Topic: Falkheim (Sky_xRe_02) [spineinside]
Replies: 12
Views: 1935

Re: Falkheim (Sky_xRe_02) [Unclaimed]

This file should be used as a base for this claim. It contains the border to claims 5+6.
by Scamp
Tue Nov 28, 2017 6:00 pm
Forum: Reviewing
Topic: Druadach Highlands|Falkheim (Sky_xRe_05) [Scamp]
Replies: 10
Views: 1285

Re: Druadach Highlands|Falkheim (Sky_xRe_05) [Scamp]

Here's a new file that doesn't have cells from northern claims in it.
by Scamp
Mon Nov 27, 2017 1:38 pm
Forum: Claimed
Topic: Snowhawk Mountain|Falkirstad (Sky_xRe_03) [Scamp]
Replies: 4
Views: 963

Re: Snowhawk Mountain|Falkirstad (Sky_xRe_03) [Unclaimed]

I'm claiming this for the time being.

Some patchwork on the mountain and working on the #2 border for a seamless transition.

I've got no plans for Falkirstad and it's very likely that I will drop this when the border/mountain stuff is taken care of.
by Scamp
Mon Nov 27, 2017 1:29 pm
Forum: SHotN General Discussion
Topic: Systematic playtesting instead of Reviewing?
Replies: 13
Views: 3213

Re: Systematic playtesting instead of Reviewing?

Just some thoughts on exterior reviews. Generally, I don't think we should postpone exterior reviews until NPCing is done; rather, we should ensure that they are truly ready for the next stage right after the exterior claim itself is considered finished. Now, the issue I see is that we don't really ...
by Scamp
Thu Nov 23, 2017 8:37 pm
Forum: SHotN Playtesting & Error Reporting
Topic: SHotN Oddities and Bugs
Replies: 20
Views: 4666

Re: SHotN Oddities and Bugs

Baby land tear in Sky_main, -108, 16. It's right on the edge, so fixing it will only be possible together with rest_exteriors.

Image
by Scamp
Tue Nov 21, 2017 10:26 pm
Forum: Reviewing
Topic: Druadach Highlands|Falkheim (Sky_xRe_05) [Scamp]
Replies: 10
Views: 1285

Re: Druadach Highlands|Falkheim (Sky_xRe_05) [Scamp]

Moving to review.


Image
by Scamp
Tue Nov 21, 2017 7:05 pm
Forum: Cross-Project Coordination
Topic: Tamriel-Data
Replies: 35
Views: 5451

Re: Tamriel-Data

The link in the first post still links to Tamriel Data v3. That should either be updated or we should just use Nexus as the only way to distribute these files.
by Scamp
Sun Nov 19, 2017 12:40 am
Forum: Reviewing
Topic: Markarth (Sky_xRe_Mk) [berry]
Replies: 170
Views: 27202

Re: Markarth (Sky_xRe_Mk) [berry]

You're not wrong, probably. I really like the forest's glooming presence right outside the city walls though.
roerich wrote:
Sun Oct 01, 2017 10:56 pm
- The forest encroaching on Markarth is a great metaphor for the relationship between the two holds.
by Scamp
Thu Nov 16, 2017 8:19 pm
Forum: Reviewing
Topic: Markarth (Sky_xRe_Mk) [berry]
Replies: 170
Views: 27202

Re: Markarth (Sky_xRe_Mk) [berry]

One Markarth cell is currently sitting at above 2000 references, couple that with an above-average amount of NPCs on the streets, container plants and the surrounding Haafinheim forest and you're bound to have instability. But like I said, I haven't actually tested it, so I might be wrong. As far as...
by Scamp
Wed Nov 15, 2017 11:39 pm
Forum: Reviewing
Topic: Markarth (Sky_xRe_Mk) [berry]
Replies: 170
Views: 27202

Re: Markarth (Sky_xRe_Mk) [berry]

There is some magic in these landscapes you make that I have yet to match. Berry, you're probably the best all-round exterior guy around here. This transition is everything I could've asked for. Haven't seen Markarth in-game yet, but it's stunning work altogether. We will have to monitor the impact ...
by Scamp
Wed Nov 15, 2017 11:11 pm
Forum: Reviewing
Topic: The Reach: Direnni Tower (Sky_iRe_DH35) [Iskuss]
Replies: 8
Views: 750

Re: The Reach: Direnni Tower (Sky_iRe_DH35) [Iskuss]

Submitting for review!

Screens looked really good on discord.
by Scamp
Wed Nov 15, 2017 1:01 pm
Forum: Reviewing
Topic: Druadach Highlands|Falkheim (Sky_xRe_05) [Scamp]
Replies: 10
Views: 1285

Re: Druadach Highlands|Falkheim (Sky_xRe_05) [Scamp]

Thanks! Eh sorry, the file is slightly outdated; I have noticed the RES usage a while back and replaced them with the regular RE ones (thus also complaining about the UV in the error thread ^^). I copied them from Lestat's Haafinheim mountain, and initially wasn't aware of the fact that there are no...
by Scamp
Sun Nov 12, 2017 11:56 pm
Forum: SHotN Playtesting & Error Reporting
Topic: SHotN Oddities and Bugs
Replies: 20
Views: 4666

Re: SHotN Oddities and Bugs

The farm houses on the farmland mesa near Karthgad all use "colony_smoke_1" for their chimneys (4 times total, all around cell -99, 14).

These should be replaced with "active_chimney_smoke02". Colony activators only appear on certain Raven Rock quest stages.
by Scamp
Sat Nov 11, 2017 11:25 pm
Forum: Reviewing
Topic: Markarth (Sky_xRe_Mk) [berry]
Replies: 170
Views: 27202

Re: Markarth (Sky_xRe_Mk) [berry]

Some additional notes (hopefully in time). I have noticed that I went quite a bit overboard on the container-plant-side of things with this region so far, hence I've made the decision to limit the number of container plants to about 15 on average per cell. I have already adjusted my claim accordingl...
by Scamp
Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:08 pm
Forum: SHotN Playtesting & Error Reporting
Topic: Skyrim_Data errors
Replies: 19
Views: 6523

Re: Skyrim_Data errors

T_Sky_TerrRockRE_RockLrg_07 T_Sky_TerrRockRE_RockLrg_11 T_Sky_TerrRockRE_RockLrg_10 T_Sky_TerrRockRE_MtPeak_01 These rocks have texture issues. Mnt peak just looks super stretched on one side, which, with the little knowledge I have, I assume is a UV issue (all mnt peak meshes have that problem, not...
by Scamp
Thu Nov 09, 2017 1:05 pm
Forum: Reviewing
Topic: The Reach: Direnni Tower (Sky_iRe_DH35) [Iskuss]
Replies: 8
Views: 750

Re: The Reach: Direnni Tower (Sky_iRe_DH35) [Iskuss]

Sure, there you go. I tried to make it somewhat visible in the exterior that this tower was part of a larger Direnni complex, a small fort nearby Anga Tor. I wouldn't mind if that basement was somehow connected to the actual fort (which doesn't have an interior claim, so this would be the only trace...
by Scamp
Fri Nov 03, 2017 5:41 pm
Forum: Reviewing
Topic: Dragonstar (Sky_xRe_Ds) [roerich]
Replies: 110
Views: 16625

Re: Dragonstar (Sky_xRe_Ds) [roerich]

Once again, great stuff. Everyone who participated did a marvellous job - this is quickly becoming one of my favourite cities.

Is that a giant chicken I see near the gate on the second-last screenshot?
by Scamp
Wed Nov 01, 2017 1:53 pm
Forum: Reviewing
Topic: Markarth (Sky_xRe_Mk) [berry]
Replies: 170
Views: 27202

Re: Markarth (Sky_xRe_Mk) [berry]

Berry; here you go. Sorry for the wait. This transition wasn't quite easy to figure out. Feel free to use the included Falkheim Region in the remainder of your claim. I can't remember if you already applied a region or not. I've included another cell that's technically not part of your claim. It wou...

Go to advanced search